Good, not good enough: On India and the Aichi-Nagoya Asian Games 2026

India's performance at the Aichi-Nagoya Asian Games fell short of internal medal targets, highlighting a need to improve in individual sports. While team events like cricket and hockey saw success, the country struggled to compete with China in disciplines like swimming.
Why it matters
Reflects India's sporting ambitions and the effectiveness of public investment in elite athlete development.
Aspiring to host the Olympic Games in 2036, India faced a harsh reality check at the Aichi-Nagoya Asian Games . Compared with the previous Hangzhou Games, where it won 106 medals with a 650-plus contingent, the country won 85 medals from around 500 athletes. The aggregate fell short of an internally projected figure of around 100 medals. It is likely to invite a thorough postmortem, given the hundreds of crores of public money spent on the athletes’ preparation. India laboured to 21 gold medals , seven fewer than in Hangzhou, after a late surge of 11 top honours in the last two days, driven by the exploits of archers, boxers, wrestlers, and hockey and cricket players. It tied with Uzbekistan but managed to retain its fourth spot on the strength of a bigger haul of silver.
Also covering this story
6 other newsrooms covered this event. We read each version separately.
'Chaotic' Asian Games threaten Japan hopes of hosting Olympics again
'Chaotic' Asian Games threaten Japan hopes of hosting Olympics again
'Chaotic' Asian Games threaten Japan hopes of hosting Olympics again
“Getting gold in Asian Games is matter of great pride”: VVS Laxman
India-Pakistan men's cricket final and hockey semi-final become most-viewed in Asian Games' history
From historic golf gold to tennis medal miss: India’s biggest hits & flops at Asian Games
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in