Article may be outdated

This article is 69 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Hindu·4 min read·medium

Why did the SC quantify labour of homemakers? | Explained

Why did the SC quantify labour of homemakers? | Explained
AI Summary

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that unpaid domestic labour by homemakers must be assigned an independent economic value in motor accident compensation cases. The court established a minimum notional income of ₹30,000 per month and mandated that compensation claims be processed with greater urgency to reduce litigation delays.

Why it matters

This ruling provides long-overdue legal recognition of the economic contribution of homemakers, potentially setting a precedent for how domestic work is valued in other areas of Indian law.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

T he Supreme Court on June 11 held that the unpaid domestic labour performed by homemakers must be assigned an independent economic value while determining compensation in motor accident death cases. It fixed a minimum notional income of ₹30,000 per month for this purpose. Observing that homemakers are “nation builders”, a Bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and N. Kotiswar Singh created a distinct head of compensation called “loss of domestic care” in motor accident claims and mandated a 10% increase in this amount every three years.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
social justicebusiness
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 90%

The article reports on a judicial ruling in a factual, neutral manner without injecting editorial opinion.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in