Why Congress should think twice about banning under
Philippine lawmakers are debating a bill that would ban social media access for individuals under 18 to protect them from online harms. The article questions the effectiveness of such a broad ban, suggesting a more nuanced approach focused on digital literacy and platform regulation.
Why it matters
This highlights the global tension between protecting minors from digital risks and maintaining freedom of access to information and social connectivity.
Already have Rappler+? Sign in to listen to groundbreaking journalism.
SOCIAL MEDIA. TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, X, Reddit app icons are seen in this illustration taken June 15, 2026
Philippine lawmakers are debating a proposed ban on social media access for individuals under 18, amid concerns about online dangers such as cyberbullying and exploitation. Australia's experience with a similar age restriction shows that bans may not effectively reduce social media use among minors, highlighting challenges in enforcement and the need to address harmful platform features. The House of Representatives has proposed a more nuanced approach, allowing restricted access for older teenagers while banning social media for those 13 and younger, emphasizing the importance of digital literacy and the need for targeted regulations. This is AI-generated.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in