Why Besigye petition against Justice Baguma failed
The Judicial Service Commission of Uganda dismissed a petition by opposition politician Dr. Kizza Besigye against High Court Judge Emmanuel Baguma. The commission stated the complaint failed to meet admissibility thresholds, noting that judicial discretion in bail rulings is not grounds for removal unless there is evidence of misconduct.
Why it matters
The case underscores the boundaries of judicial oversight and the challenges opposition figures face when questioning the impartiality of the judiciary.
NEWS Leave a comment
Kampala, Uganda | URN | The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has revealed that it dismissed a complaint filed by jailed opposition politician Dr. Kizza Besigye against High Court Judge Justice Emmanuel Baguma, saying it did not meet the commission’s admissibility threshold.
Speaking to journalists after the launch of the Commission’s Strategic Plan III, Client Charter and Service Delivery Standards on Friday at the Supreme Cour, JSC Chairperson Dr. Douglas Singiza said the commission only investigates complaints that fall within its legal mandate. He noted that when for instance a judicial officer fights with his wife, they can’t entertain such a complaint.
He explained that complaints challenging a judicial officer’s exercise of discretion, such as granting or denying bail, are not matters for the Judicial Service Commission unless there is evidence of misconduct, including corruption, bias or other impropriety.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in