'We let down Lindsay,' says juror who served in Clancy trial

A juror from the Lindsay Clancy trial expressed personal distress after the case ended in a mistrial due to a single holdout. The majority of the jury favored a not guilty verdict based on the defense's argument of postpartum psychosis.
Why it matters
The case highlights the complex intersection of mental health, the legal system, and the societal understanding of postpartum conditions.
One of the jurors who served during the trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children in 2023, shared with NewsCenter 5 that she felt a sense of failure after the case ended in a mistrial last week. "Everybody says you're not supposed to feel like you failed, but you have a task to come out unanimous. And we tried everything we could to get to that end. And I feel like we let down Lindsay," said Paula, 65, of Whitman, who was one of the 12 deliberating jurors who heard the case. Clancy's defense did not dispute that she killed the children but argued that she should not be found criminally responsible because she was in the throes of postpartum psychosis at the time. Her trial began with jury selection on July 20 and ended in a mistrial Sept.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in