Washington farmer challenges $618,000 irrigation penalties in state Supreme Court
A Washington farmer is challenging $618,000 in irrigation penalties before the state Supreme Court, arguing that the Department of Ecology failed to provide required technical assistance. The case questions the extent of government authority in enforcing internal policies that impact private property rights.
Why it matters
This case addresses the balance between state environmental regulation and the rights of agricultural business owners.
A Washington farmer who returned to his family’s farm in 1984 is challenging a long-running dispute with the state Department of Ecology after penalties over irrigation threatened the future of his agricultural business. Ron Fodé and his wife, Robin, say the agency refused to help them find a lawful way to irrigate their crops before imposing penalties that originally totalled $618,000. The case has reached the Washington Supreme Court, which heard arguments on October 1, 2026. At its centre is a question about whether the state agency followed a law requiring it to provide technical assistance to water users before moving to penalties.As reported by The Spokesman-Review, Ron and Robin Fodé wrote that the dispute had nearly destroyed their business. The couple said they once farmed 4,000 acres of owned and leased land but now lease just 290 acres.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in