Vegemite is not a human right

An Australian prisoner lost a legal challenge to overturn a prison ban on Vegemite, which he argued violated his cultural rights. The court ruled that the ban is a justified security measure to prevent alcohol brewing and interference with drug-detection dogs.
Why it matters
This case highlights the tension between individual cultural rights and the operational security requirements within the prison system.
A prisoner on Monday lost his challenge to an Australian state’s ban on inmates eating Vegemite after he argued in court that withholding the polarizing yeast-based spread breached his human right to “enjoy his culture as an Australian.” Andre McKechnie, 55, who is serving a life sentence for murder, took his battle for the salty, sticky, black-brown byproduct of brewing beer to the Supreme Court of the state of Victoria last year. He had argued being refused Vegemite denied him his right under the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act to “enjoy his culture as an Australian in the community with other persons of Australian background,” court documents showed. Justice Claire Harris accepted prison authorities’ refusal to allow McKechnie Vegemite “limited his cultural rights” under the charter. But she found the ban was justified in meeting authorities’ goals of removing illicit drugs and alcohol from the prison system.
Also covering this story
2 other newsrooms covered this event. We read each version separately.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in