US Supreme Court sides with Trump in legal battle over Elon Musk’s DOGE records
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Trump administration's appeal in a legal battle over public records concerning Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) argues DOGE should be subject to federal transparency laws like the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), while the Trump administration maintains it's an exempt presidential advisory body. This marks the second time the Supreme Court has intervened in the dispute, which questions the scope of government transparency.
Why it matters
This case has significant implications for government transparency and accountability, potentially defining the scope of federal agencies subject to public records laws and the confidentiality of presidential advisory bodies.
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Trump administration’s challenge to a lawsuit seeking public records about trillionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).The move has reopened a legal battle over whether the US government initiative is subject to federal transparency laws.The case was brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which argues that DOGE should be treated as a federal agency and made subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The watchdog is seeking records of DOGE’s activities during the early months of US president Donald Trump’s second term.The Trump administration maintains that DOGE is a presidential advisory body and is therefore exempt from FOIA requirements.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in