Untouchability and the idea of ‘purity’
A purification ritual performed after a political rally in Haldwani has sparked a legal debate regarding the definition of untouchability under the Indian Constitution. The incident raises questions about whether symbolic acts of 'purity' constitute discriminatory offenses.
Why it matters
The case tests the legal boundaries of Article 17 and the Protection of Civil Rights Act in addressing non-physical forms of caste-based discrimination.
A shuddhikaran (purification) ritual was performed at Haldwani’s Ramlila ground on August 10, two days after Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge addressed a rally there. Mr. Kharge said the ritual made him feel the “sting of untouchability” and sought legal action, while the organisation that performed it offered a different explanation, citing slogans allegedly raised during the rally and Mr. Kharge’s earlier political remarks. The dispute raises a legal question beyond the immediate controversy: what does Indian law regard as untouchability when the alleged wrong is not denial of entry, but the “purification” of a place after a Dalit person has used it?
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in