UK will know of incoming hits but cannot stop most missiles

A former UK military commander warns that the country lacks a robust missile defense system, noting that current investments are insufficient to protect against modern threats. He emphasizes that the UK's current capabilities are limited and far from the 'Iron Dome' level of protection many assume exists.
Why it matters
It raises significant concerns regarding national security and the adequacy of current defense spending in the face of potential geopolitical aggression.
Giving evidence on the Defence Investment Plan alongside Lord Robertson, his fellow Strategic Defence Review author, the former Commander of Joint Forces Command was asked whether the roughly 790 million the plan provides for homeland integrated air and missile defence is enough to be ready for possible Russian aggression against NATO by 2030. Setting out what the money actually purchases, Barrons said the bulk of it goes on improved command and control. "You'll know better that you're going to be hit by a missile," he told MPs, alongside "some improvements for the Air Force's ability to shoot down cruise missiles" and improvements to the Type 45 destroyers "so it has a better capability against ballistic missiles." The distinction matters because command and control determines how well a country can detect, track and warn of incoming threats, while the capacity to intercept them depends on launchers, interceptors and directed energy weapons held in numbers, and it is that layer, on the general's account, that the plan barely touches.
The article reports on expert testimony and defense policy without taking a partisan stance, though it highlights a critical view of government spending.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in