U.S. Judge again blocks Postal Service’s mail-in voting restrictions
A federal judge has extended an injunction blocking new USPS mail-in voting rules, citing potential disenfranchisement and lack of congressional authority. The administration has filed an appeal against the ruling.
Why it matters
This legal battle impacts the administration of US elections and the accessibility of mail-in voting during a congressional election cycle.
A federal judge on Friday (September 4, 2026) extended a ban stopping President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing a new U.S. Postal Service rule that would tighten mail-in voting requirements ahead of the November congressional elections.
Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued the injunction at the behest of Democratic-led states and voting rights groups, after one state sent out mail ballots for the elections on Friday (September 4, 2026). Ms. Talwani wrote that only laws passed by Congress can supersede states’ authority over elections, adding “the executive has no inherent authority” over voting rules.
Congress has never delegated authority over voting to the Postal Service, Ms. Talwani wrote, and the agency’s new rule “clashes with Congress’s statutory scheme, and is unconstitutional.”
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in