Trying to fix complicated problems
The author reflects on the difficulty of solving complex systemic problems, using healthcare and chess as metaphors for the challenge of identifying critical details. The piece critiques high-profile attempts to reform healthcare, such as the Haven venture, as examples of failed systemic change.
Why it matters
It offers a philosophical perspective on why large-scale institutional reform is often unsuccessful despite expert involvement.
One day I watched a video where David Pruess goes through an analysis of a chess position (David is an amazing chess teacher and commentator), and he goes through like a dozen moves before pointing out one random little detail that reverses the conclusion. This is kind of funny because a less talented chess player looks at the position, miscalculates everywhere, gives up and goes, "well idk, White must be losing." An advanced player knows what they're doing -- and clearly, White is winning. And a tiny handful of players say hmm, something seems off here, and they get great joy out of looking for that random little detail, and that detail wins them the game. The real world seems more like chess than checkers, and most of us aren't that good.
The author expresses skepticism toward institutional reform, which is a common analytical viewpoint rather than a partisan political stance.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in