Article may be outdated

This article is 74 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Times of India·4 min read·medium

Third-Place Showdown: Why England vs France is a 900-year-old derby

N
NIRMALYA DUTTA
Third-Place Showdown: Why England vs France is a 900-year-old derby
✦AI Summary

The article explores the historical rivalry between England and France ahead of their World Cup third-place match. It frames the modern sporting contest through the lens of a 900-year-old geopolitical and cultural feud.

Why it matters

It provides cultural context to international sports, illustrating how historical narratives influence modern perceptions of competitive events.

✦Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Hello and welcome to Day 38 of this sprawling World Cup.There is a hilarious scene in Yes, Minister when the Right Hoodwinked, sorry, Right Honourable Jim Hacker asks whether nuclear weapons are absolutely necessary. Surely, if push came to shove, the United States would protect Britain from Russia?A flabbergasted Sir Humphrey Appleby declares that Hacker should resign if he holds such unilateralist views, before pointing out that Britain’s nuclear weapons are not intended to protect it from Russia.They are meant to protect it from France.When the LSE-educated Hacker points out that the French are their allies, a beleaguered Sir Humphrey explains: “They are now, but they’ve been our enemies for most of the past 900 years. If they’ve got the bomb, we must have the bomb!”Whatever Sir Humphrey’s faults, the Oxford-educated man certainly knew his history.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
sportscultureworld
✦

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in