Article may be outdated

This article is 74 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Business Insider·3 min read·medium

The US Army wants to order 11,000 next-generation missiles to replace its aging Stingers

The US Army wants to order 11,000 next-generation missiles to replace its aging Stingers
AI Summary

The US Army is seeking to procure 11,000 next-generation short-range interceptor missiles to replace its aging Stinger missile inventory. Lockheed Martin and RTX are competing to develop the new 'fire and forget' weapon system over the next decade.

Why it matters

Modernizing short-range air defense is critical for the US military to counter evolving threats from drones and aircraft in modern combat environments.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Marines prepare to fire an FIM-92 Stinger missile during a training exercise. Sgt. Brian Knowles/US Marine Corps Army plans to buy 11,000 next-generation missiles to replace aging Stingers Lockheed Martin and RTX, formerly Raytheon, are competing to build the new shoulder-fired weapon The missile is designed to counter aircraft, helicopters, and larger drones The US Army is preparing for a major overhaul of its short-range air defense arsenal and is seeking 11,000 next-generation missiles to replace its aging Stinger missile . In a request for information document published on the government's contracting website last week, the service said it's looking for defense industry input on production of the Next Generation Short Range Interceptor, or NGSRI, a new surface-to-air missile. The Army, together with industry partners, began developing the weapons in 2023 and hopes to begin producing them in five years. A planning estimate included in the documents posted online calls for the procurement of approximately 11,000 missiles and 2,200 launch assemblies over ten years. Defense industry juggernauts Lockheed Martin and RTX are each competing to be the Army's choice for Stinger replacements. RTX's Raytheon business makes the current Stinger. Each tested potential replacement options earlier this year. Lockheed conducted the first in a series of planned flight tests in January, and in February, RTX's Raytheon carried out a ballistic test. The Army says that the new NGSRI will be a "fire and forget" missile, meaning the shooter doesn't have to guide it after launch, capable of defeating helicopters, fixed-wing aircraft, and larger unmanned aerial systems. It is intended to replace the FIM-92 Stinger, a shoulder-fired missile that has been a cornerstone of American short-range air defense for decades. Like the US military's FGM-148 Javelin and M3 MAAWS Carl-Gustaf systems often used to target vehicles or tanks, the Stinger is small enough to be carried by ground combat personnel and is fired by mounting the weapon on the shooter's shoulder. The Stinger is characterized as a MANPADS, or man-portable air-defense system. It relies on an infrared-homing seeker to engage targets and has been in service since the early 1980s. Though reliable, the modern air defense environment is becoming increasingly complex, demanding more advanced capabilities. The coming NGSRI is expected to be faster, have a longer range, and be more survivable while also being able to engage a wider range of aerial threats. The Army's interest in procuring thousands of NGSRI missiles comes as the US military grapples with growing concern over munitions stockpiles . While fighting in the Middle East has taken a toll on stocks of higher-end air defense systems, significant transfers to Ukraine over the years have depleted the US Stinger arsenal. Those stockpiles aren't easily rebuilt, since the Stinger is an older weapon with a relatively cold industrial base. Rather than reignite production, the Army is instead chasing a replacement. According to the Army's request document, the Stinger replacements should be compatible with existing launch platforms. Read the original article on Business Insider

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
technologypoliticsscience
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 95%

The article provides a straightforward account of military procurement plans and industry competition.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in