Article may be outdated

This article is 40 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Hindu·4 min read·medium

The political storm in Punjab surrounding ‘Satluj’ movie | Explained

V
Vikas Vasudeva
The political storm in Punjab surrounding ‘Satluj’ movie | Explained
AI Summary

The film 'Satluj', based on the life of activist Jaswant Singh Khalra, was removed from ZEE5's Indian catalogue following a certification dispute and government scrutiny. The film's removal has sparked a political movement in Punjab, with various religious and political groups organizing public screenings to protest the suppression of historical narratives regarding the state's militancy era.

Why it matters

The controversy highlights the ongoing tension between creative freedom and state censorship in India, particularly regarding the portrayal of sensitive historical events and human rights violations.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

The story so far: On July 3, the film Satluj , earlier titled Punjab‘95 was removed from OTT (Over-the-Top) offerings soon after it was premiered by ZEE5 . The film details the life of activist Jaswant Singh Khalra , who worked towards uncovering alleged extrajudicial cremations in Punjab in the traumatic phase of terrorism between the mid-1980s and early-1990s. Even as no official blocking order has been made public, reports have suggested that a central government-appointed committee is examining the film under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act. The film, directed by Honey Trehan and starring Diljit Dosanjh, premiered after years of delays over a certification dispute with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). However, within two days, the platform removed the film from its India catalogue while continuing to stream it internationally through ZEE5 Global .

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicsentertainmentculturesocial justice
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 85%

The article provides a balanced overview by presenting the perspectives of both the film's supporters, who view it as a historical record, and government representatives, who question the accuracy of the claims presented.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in