The Normalization of Inexplicable Failures
The author critiques the modern trend of accepting 'inexplicable failures' in software, specifically focusing on the rise of AI tools like Jev. The piece argues that companies are deploying opaque AI models without proper evaluation or error budgets, prioritizing speed over reliability.
Why it matters
It highlights the growing industry concern regarding the lack of rigorous testing and accountability in the rapid deployment of AI-powered software.
i hate the future: the normalization of inexplicable failures
the normalization of inexplicable failures
In a recent episode of President Curtis , the President struggles with opening a door on two separate occasions.
These doors don't work because there are obstructions in the way: a body initially, then roughly a billion dollars worth of gold.
In both instances, in response to the frustration, the character mutters "stupid thing sucks." This is not a reasonable model of doors! Doors should not "suck" inexplicably! I found these moments outrageously hilarious ¹ but maybe my stupid brain just sucks.
Jev: Making more doors that suck The Internet has been abuzz about Jev, an AI model developed by TypeSafe AI, which returns typed values with probability estimates. The important things about Jev are, as far as I can tell:
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in