Article may be outdated

This article is 5 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Hindu·3 min read·medium

The Indian men’s hockey team’s selection process leaves a lot to be desired

U
Uthra Ganesan
The Indian men’s hockey team’s selection process leaves a lot to be desired
AI Summary

The Indian men's hockey team's recent poor performance has sparked criticism regarding the opacity and inefficiency of the Hockey India selection committee. Reports suggest that many qualified selectors are being ignored, while the High Performance Director position remains vacant.

Why it matters

Governance issues in national sports federations directly affect the competitiveness and long-term development of elite athletes.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

With the Indian men’s hockey team returning a disappointing performance at the recent World Cup, questions have already been raised over coach Craig Fulton’s role and the continuation of several senior players in the side.

But what has gone unnoticed is the role of selectors; specifically, the ones who selected the team. However, questioning the selectors is easier said than done, given the complete opacity around Hockey India’s selection committee and its workings.

According to the Hockey India website itself, there are 16 selectors that take turns for selection duty besides the chief coaches, scientific advisors / doctors / physiotherapists and the High Performance Director. In reality, the same people have been going around for years.

Consider this: Yuvraj Walmiki and Chinglensana Singh Kangujam, the youngest of the lot, have not been informed or invited for selection duties for almost two years.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
sportspolitics

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in