Taking Greenland won't fix the US's problems in the Arctic, experts say
Experts argue that the U.S. should focus on investing in existing Arctic infrastructure and Alaska Native communities rather than attempting to acquire Greenland. The region is becoming increasingly strategic due to climate change and competition from Russia.
Why it matters
Geopolitical strategy in the Arctic is shifting as melting ice opens new routes, making infrastructure and regional stability critical for national security.
Alaska's northern coast falls within the Arctic Circle. Marco Secci/Business Insider The US has fallen behind Russia in the Arctic. Taking Greenland won't fix that, experts say. The answer is investing in the Arctic territory and military infrastructure the US already has. Experts say the US's Arctic operations also suffer from neglecting Alaska Native communities. President Donald Trump's repeated calls to acquire Greenland , reiterated most recently at a NATO summit last month in Turkey, have thrust the Arctic into the global political spotlight. The bigger challenge, they say, isn't acquiring more Arctic territory. It's that the US has spent decades underinvesting in the Arctic presence it already has. "The notion that we would take Greenland and somehow improve it is a fallacy," Kenneth Rosen, a journalist and author of the book "Polar War," told Business Insider. "We have not done that in Alaska."
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in