Supreme Court urges states to decide on raising retirement age of judges by Sept 2
The Supreme Court of India has directed state governments to decide by September 2 on increasing the retirement age of trial court judges from 60 to 62 years. The court rejected arguments regarding financial constraints and parity with other government employees, emphasizing the need to retain experienced judicial officers.
Why it matters
This decision aims to address judicial vacancies and improve the efficiency of the lower courts by retaining seasoned legal professionals.
NEW DELHI: Attempting to bring judicial officers’ retirement age on a par with that for HC judges, the Supreme Court on Wednesday asked states to decide by Sept 2 on increasing the superannuation age of trial court judges from 60 to 62 years while brushing aside pleas of financial constraints and the disparity it would create vis-a-vis government employees.In the early 1990s, the Supreme Court had increased through a judgment the retirement age of judicial officers across India from 58 to 60 years. This time, however, a bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana said that instead of a judicial ruling, it would be better if state governments made the decision on their own. The strength of trial court judges has doubled since 1992, from around 10,000 to over 20,000 at present.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in