Supreme Court says inclined to cancel bail of Shiv Sena corporator accused of assaulting Thane doctors

The Supreme Court expressed an inclination to cancel the bail of a Shiv Sena corporator accused of assaulting doctors in Thane. The court emphasized that those who disrespect the medical fraternity should not be granted bail.
Why it matters
Reflects the judiciary's stance on protecting medical professionals and the legal scrutiny of bail orders in cases of public violence.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (September 1, 2026) said it was inclined to cancel the bail granted to Shiv Sena corporator Ramesh Sukrya Mhatre, who is accused of assaulting three municipal doctors in Thane, observing that those who "have no respect for the medical fraternity" should not be out on bail. However, the court also said it would await a plea by the State government seeking cancellation of his bail before passing a formal order.
A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and Augustine George Masih was hearing Mr. Mhatre’s plea challenging the Bombay High Court’s July 18 order staying the bail granted to him by the trial court, as well as its August 7 order imposing stringent conditions on his release, including that he remain outside Maharashtra until the commencement of the trial.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in