Supreme Court restricts use of geofence warrants
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants, which allow police to search broad tech databases for location data near crime scenes, violate the Fourth Amendment. The 6-3 decision limits law enforcement's ability to conduct mass digital surveillance.
Why it matters
This ruling sets a major precedent for digital privacy rights in the age of big data, curbing the government's ability to perform 'search first, suspect later' investigations.
The Supreme Court on Thursday restricted the use of a relatively new law enforcement technique that allows police to tap into giant tech-firm databases to see who was near the scene of a crime.
The article presents both the court's legal reasoning and the government's counter-arguments in a balanced manner.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in