Supreme Court rejects plea for rotation of SC/ST-reserved seats in Parliament, Assemblies

The Indian Supreme Court has rejected a plea to mandate the rotation of SC/ST-reserved parliamentary and assembly constituencies. The court ruled that such decisions are the responsibility of the legislature rather than the judiciary.
Why it matters
The ruling maintains the status quo for electoral reservation policies, which are central to Indian social justice and political representation.
New Delhi The Supreme Court on Wednesday (November 4, 2026) refused to entertain a plea seeking mandatory rotation of constituencies reserved for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in Parliament and State Assemblies, saying that such decisions lie within the domain of the legislature and cannot be ordered by courts. A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana refused to interfere with the Allahabad High Court judgment upholding Section 9(1)(c) of the Delimitation Act, 2002, which provides for the identification of reserved constituencies in areas having a comparatively higher proportion of SC/ST population. Women’s Reservation Bill and Delimitation 2026: Key takeaways Women’s Reservation Bill and Delimitation 2026: Key takeaways The proposed legislation seeks to expand the Lok Sabha seats from 543 to 850, addressing demographic shifts since the last adjustment in 1976, thus reshaping political power across the nation.
Also covering this story
One other newsroom covered this event. We read that version too.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in