Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to reject student IDs at polls

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that New Hampshire may reject student IDs as valid identification for voting in the upcoming midterm elections. The court cited the Purcell Principle, arguing that lower court intervention so close to an election creates unnecessary voter confusion.
Why it matters
This decision impacts voter access and highlights the ongoing legal debates surrounding election integrity and identification requirements in the U.S.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday allowed New Hampshire officials to reject student IDs as a valid form of identification when voters cast their ballots in next month's midterm elections. A lower court judge previously found that state officials had improperly gone further than a new law restricting the use of student IDs to obtain a ballot, ruling that officials still had to consider student IDs alongside other evidence when voters lacked other means of verifying their identity. But the Supreme Court took issue with the judge intervening this close to the elections. ARIZONA VOTER LAW FIGHT REACHES SCOTUS AS ELECTION GROUPS WARN ‘ABSURD’ CONSEQUENCE COULD ENSUE The high court has said orders handed down too close to an election can cause voter confusion, an idea known as the Purcell Principle. The court cited the recent legal back-and-forth over Missouri’s redistricting maps.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in