The Age·5 min read·medium

Superannuation shouldn’t be untouchable, says expert: ‘People get hysterical’

P
Paul Sakkal
Superannuation shouldn’t be untouchable, says expert: ‘People get hysterical’
AI Summary

An expert is calling for a public debate on the flexibility of Australia's superannuation system, suggesting it could be used for housing or wage support. This proposal has sparked political friction between the Labor government and opposition parties.

Why it matters

The debate touches on the fundamental purpose of retirement savings versus immediate economic relief, a major policy issue in Australia.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Save You have reached your maximum number of saved items.

Remove items from your saved list to add more.

Share A A A A leading superannuation expert has called for an open debate on the use of retirement savings for housing and non-retirement purposes as the Coalition’s top brass splits on how to respond to One Nation’s plan to use super to top up wages.

Days after Labor declared the next election a referendum on superannuation, Dr Emily Millane – who is about to publish Super , a history of Australia’s multitrillion-dollar private pension scheme – said the debate on super had become “hysterical”.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicseconomy

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in