SJC ruling in similar case puts spotlight on judge
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has vacated a murder conviction, ruling that a judge improperly excluded psychiatric evidence in an insanity defense case. This decision has drawn attention to the same judge's handling of a similar high-profile murder trial involving Lindsay Clancy.
Why it matters
The ruling highlights the critical role of evidentiary standards in insanity defense cases and may influence the trajectory of ongoing high-profile criminal trials.
The state Supreme Judicial Court on Thursday put the judge overseeing Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial on notice with a pointed reversal in a parallel case that also turns on an insanity defense.
Plymouth Superior Court Judge William F. Sullivan erred when he excluded psychiatric records for a Brockton mother who was prosecuted for killing her two sons in 2018, the justices ruled.
Because of the misstep, Latarsha Sanders didn’t get a fair trial. The court vacated her convictions on two counts of first-degree murder and granted her a new trial. Sullivan declined to comment through a court spokesperson.
It remains to be seen whether the legal principle in the SJC opinion will surface in Clancy’s case, which covers some of the same territory as Sanders’ trial: Mothers charged with killing their children and asserting they are not criminally responsible for the offenses because of mental illness.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in