SIR: Voters above 85 years face double checks, say BLOs
Booth Level Officers in Karnataka report being instructed to flag voters aged 85 and above as 'probable absent, shifted, dead/deleted or duplicate' during the electoral roll revision process. While officials deny these directives, residents and civil society groups fear this practice could lead to the disenfranchisement of senior citizens.
Why it matters
This highlights potential systemic issues in electoral integrity and the administrative hurdles faced by elderly voters in democratic processes.
With the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) under way in Karnataka, Booth Level Officers (BLOs) say they have been instructed to “double verify” voters aged ‘85 years and above’ and place them under the “probable absent, shifted, dead/deleted or duplicate (ASDD)” category.
While Chief Electoral Officer V. Anbu Kumar denied that any such instructions had been issued, multiple BLOs told The Hindu that they had been directed to flag voters above 85 for ASDD verification ‘even before any discrepancy has been established’.
“Nobody whose enumeration form has been submitted should be placed under the ASDD category. But within the BLO app, there is a category called ‘Probable ASD’ where all voters above 85 are directly linked. We have been told to mark voters above 85 as ASDD because they are presumed unlikely to be voting,” a BLO said.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in