SIR in Manipur is a pathway to exclusion
The article argues that the Election Commission of India's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Manipur is being used to disenfranchise specific communities. It highlights how this process exacerbates existing ethnic tensions between the Meitei, Kuki-Zo, and Naga populations during a period of severe civil conflict.
Why it matters
It raises critical concerns about the integrity of democratic processes and voter representation in regions experiencing active ethnic violence.
Manipur is one of the States covered under Phase III of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls being implemented by the Election Commission of India (ECI) currently. The SIR has already drawn adverse criticism from civil society organisations and the Opposition, particularly after the recent Bihar and West Bengal elections, due to its hasty, disproportionate and summary deletion of voters from voters’ lists, resulting in the disenfranchisement of large sections of politically “undesirable” communities and voters. Concerns have been expressed by informed citizens about the lack of transparency and often blatant bias of the State and the ruling party in relation to the SIR, and its relationship with the planned delimitation, the 2029 elections and perhaps even an oddly timed Census. These concerns apply to Manipur as well. In addition, there are features of the situation in Manipur that are little known outside — and even within — the State, making the implementation of the SIR in Manipur even more egregious.
The article uses strong, critical language such as 'pathway to exclusion' and 'blatant bias' to challenge government administrative actions.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in