Scott Eastwood in Rod Davis Lurie WW II Drama
Director Rod Davis Lurie's new World War II film, Lucky Strike, stars Scott Eastwood as a soldier navigating the Battle of the Bulge. Despite high production values and authentic intent, the film is criticized for relying on genre clichés and failing to distinguish itself from other war dramas.
Why it matters
It highlights the ongoing challenge of creating original content within the saturated war film genre.
The second time is not the charm for director Rod Davis Lurie, producer Marc Frydman and actor Scott Eastwood , reuniting for their second war film after 2020's excellent The Outpost . Set during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II, Lucky Strike features the same immersive visual qualities as its predecessor, as well as an admirable commitment to be as authentic as possible. But this effort about a soldier desperately trying to survive behind enemy lines never overcomes its oppressive air of familiarity, suffering in comparison to too many war films in recent years ( Saving Private Ryan , Inglourious Basterds , 1917 , etc.) to which it bears obvious resemblances. And while Lurie's filmmaking is as assured as ever, the screenplay he's co-written with Frydman features far too many clich s endemic to the genre. Related Stories Movies How Colin Hanks Made a John Candy Documentary Without the Usual Celebrity Scandal Movies Colin Hanks on John Candy s Comic Genius, Ryan Reynolds and How Bad Guy Roles "Can Be Liberating"
The review provides a balanced critique of the film's technical merits versus its narrative shortcomings.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in