Scientists reveal the hidden cost of remembering
Researchers have developed a model suggesting that organisms face a binary choice regarding memory: either ignore it to save energy or invest significant resources to maintain it. The study indicates that there is no middle ground, with a sudden shift to memory-based strategies occurring only once energy resources cross a specific threshold.
Why it matters
This research provides a fundamental biological framework for understanding how energy constraints dictate cognitive evolution and decision-making strategies in living organisms.
An animal crossing a patchy landscape can trust what its senses report right now, or lean on what it learned an hour ago. Memory runs on energy, and that cost decides whether it keeps one at all.
Storing information is never free. The bill arrives whether the memory sits in a brain, a bacterial signaling network, or the proteins inside a single cell .
When is remembering worth paying for? A theory paper from the Institute of Industrial Science and RIKEN answers with a sharp edge.
Takehiro Tottori and Tetsuya J. Kobayashi have found that an organism on a tight budget should ignore memory entirely.
The switch to using it, when it comes, happens all at once.
The pair built a deliberately small model of an organism tracking something that keeps moving. Call it a food patch, a chemical gradient, or a temperature.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in