Article may be outdated

This article is 51 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Times of India·3 min read·hard

SC nixes rulings by NCLT, NCLAT based on fake AI citations

A
AMIT ANAND CHOUDHARY
SC nixes rulings by NCLT, NCLAT based on fake AI citations
AI Summary

The Indian Supreme Court has quashed legal orders that relied on AI-generated, non-existent case laws, warning that unchecked AI usage threatens the integrity of the justice system. The court has mandated a zero-tolerance policy for AI-hallucinated precedents and called for regulatory oversight.

Why it matters

This is a landmark ruling on the risks of integrating generative AI into legal processes, highlighting the necessity of human verification in high-stakes decision-making.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

NEW DELHI: In the first case of its kind, Supreme Court on Thursday quashed orders passed by NCLT and NCLAT on the ground that they decided a case on the basis of AI-generated non-existent case laws and verdicts, cautioning that unchecked use of AI could distort the justice delivery system.A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Alok Aradhe cautioned both the Bar and the Bench on the use of AI, saying the human element should remain in the driving seat and have "absolute and total control over the application and usage of AI"."For us... the production of fake, non-existent, and hallucinated material and its utilisation as precedents in law, is like the release of methyl isocyanate in the province of law and justice: invisible, insidious, and catastrophic by the time anyone notices," Justice Narasimha said.The bench said AI was not just an aid but "an alternative to our own thinking, reasoning and even decision making", making regulation essential. In the insolvency case, NCLT relied on AI-generated material and cited six non-existent SC judgments. The fake judgments also escaped scrutiny by NCLAT. Lawyers told the apex court they had not supplied the fake judgments and that the tribunal had obtained the material through its own research."It is necessary for courts to adopt a zero-tolerance mode for producing, citing or using AI-generated precedents without verification," the bench said, adding that any decision relying even partly on fake or hallucinated AI material "is no decision in the eyes of the law" and must be set aside.The court directed the Bar Council of India to constitute a committee to deliberate on the problem of lawyers submitting fake or hallucinated AI-generated material as legal precedents. It warned that delegating thinking to AI could have serious consequences for the human capacity to distinguish truth from falsehood and justice from injustice.Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
technologypolitics
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 90%

The article reports on a judicial ruling and the court's reasoning regarding technology ethics.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in