Satya Niketan building collapse: Can a 'no-responsibility' clause shield a PG owner?
The Delhi High Court is investigating whether private paying guest (PG) accommodations can use 'no-responsibility' clauses to avoid liability for building safety and resident injuries. Legal experts argue that such disclaimers cannot override statutory legal duties or protect owners from negligence.
Why it matters
This case sets a critical legal precedent for tenant rights and landlord accountability in the rapidly growing private student housing sector in India.
NEW DELHI: The Satya Niketan building collapse, which killed seven people and injured several others, has raised questions about who can be held responsible when people living in private paying guest (PG) accommodation are exposed to an unsafe building. The issue has gained a legal dimension after the rent agreement signed by residents of the PG reportedly contained clauses limiting the hostel's responsibility for casualties, injuries and loss or damage in certain circumstances.The incident has also prompted the Delhi high court to examine whether responsibility for the tragedy, if negligence is established, could extend beyond the building owner.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in