Russia and America Are Rediscovering the Limits of Nuclear Weapons
This analysis argues that nuclear weapons have become ineffective tools for achieving victory in regional conflicts, as evidenced by recent wars involving the U.S. and Russia. The author suggests that despite massive modernization spending, nuclear deterrence does not translate into success in conventional military engagements.
Why it matters
It challenges traditional military doctrines and questions the strategic value of nuclear modernization in the context of modern geopolitical conflicts.
Vlad Karkov / SOPA Images / Getty July 13, 2026, 7 AM ET Share Save H enry Kissinger often said that nuclear arms are “weapons in search of a doctrine.” After the Cold War, some strategists have tried to figure out what, exactly, these weapons could buy them beyond deterrence. The answer, as it turns out, is: nothing.
Two wars taking place right now are cases in point. The ongoing American attacks on Iran and Russia’s desperate campaign of atrocities in Ukraine have produced dramatic footage of two major powers taking on middleweight military opponents, inflicting grievous damage, and yet failing to achieve their goals. Among other painful lessons, the Americans and the Russians are learning, again, that their impressive array of nuclear weapons does not offer them a victorious path out of such conflicts.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in