"Robot" Is a Social Construct: Why Your Dishwasher Is Not a Robot
A roboticist explores the semantic debate over the definition of a 'robot,' arguing that the term is a social construct rather than a strictly technical one. The author uses the example of a dishwasher to illustrate how technical definitions often fail to capture the cultural usage of the word.
Why it matters
Understanding how we define technology influences public perception, safety standards, and the development of future autonomous systems.
The most effective way to nerd snipe a roboticist is to present them with a controversial definition of a “robot”. When I served on an industrial safety standards development committee, we once spent a memorable two full days trying to define “robot” sufficiently broadly so as to ensure the standard would apply to all reasonably forseeable uses of industrial robotic arms in industrial automation, but sufficiently narrowly so as to ensure we did not accidentally force newly developed types of industrial robots into a standard that would wrongly constrain them. This was, I say with all honesty, was an immensely enjoyable two days. I love this kind of thing. I will be pedantic all day long.
So of course, my esteemed colleague Tina decided to lob a grenade at me by asserting that a dishwasher is a robot.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in