Right of way: On the right to walk on demarcated footpaths

The Indian Supreme Court has reaffirmed the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Article 21. The article discusses the challenges of implementing this right due to urban encroachment and lack of national pedestrian laws.
Why it matters
This legal precedent highlights the tension between rapid urbanization and the basic rights of pedestrians in Indian cities.
As part of the Supreme Court’s expansion of Article 21 since the 1970s, it has declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths a fundamental right . The Bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Atul S. Chandurkar reaffirmed the right in a case seeking higher compensation for a five-year-old boy’s death after being struck and killed by a tanker lorry in Karnataka. As motorised transport has become more widespread, the Bench noted with regret that walking has become an inconvenience, with motorists often treating pedestrians as a ‘nuisance’ to be tolerated or cleared. In the absence of a national law governing pedestrian rights, responsibility for pedestrian safety is split across municipal laws, town-planning statutes, and street design guidelines. As such, pedestrians are considered to be safe if they face no immediate physical harm. Most cities also lack continuous unobstructed footpaths; where footpaths do exist, they are often encroached on by parking, vendors, utilities, and construction debris, and competing pressures such as road widening work.
Provides a balanced overview of a legal judgment and the practical difficulties of urban planning.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in