Relationship ending without marriage doesn't amount to rape: Uttarakhand HC
The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that the breakdown of a consensual relationship, even if it involved a promise of marriage, does not constitute rape. The court quashed a criminal case against a man, clarifying the legal distinction between broken promises and criminal deception.
Why it matters
This ruling provides significant legal precedent regarding the interpretation of 'consent' in relationships and the misuse of rape laws in cases of broken romantic commitments.
NEW DELHI: The Uttarakhand high court has quashed a rape case registered against a man who was accused of establishing a physical relationship with a woman on the false promise of marriage. The court held that the two had met on the dating app Tinder and entered into a consensual relationship, which cannot later be treated as rape merely because it broke down without ending in marriage. The court quashed the FIR and all related proceedings on July 16.How did the Tinder relationship lead to a rape case?According to the court order, the woman first came in contact with the man on the dating app Tinder in August 2019. The two started talking and soon became close friends. Later, the man came to Haldwani to meet her, and the two went to visit Bhimtal and Hanuman Dham together.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in