Pro-Palestinian activists targeted Israeli businesses. What happened next?

The Philadelphia-based restaurant group CookNSolo is closing six locations, sparking a debate over whether pro-Palestinian boycott campaigns are responsible for the decline. While activists claim victory, the owners suggest the situation is more complex, involving broader economic challenges and shifting consumer demand.
Why it matters
This highlights the growing tension between political activism and the economic viability of businesses owned by individuals with ties to controversial geopolitical conflicts.
Anti-Israel boycott activists celebrated on social media last week, convinced they had brought one of America’s most successful Israeli-American culinary groups to its knees. CookNSolo, the Philadelphia restaurant group founded by prominent Israeli-American chef Michael Solomonov and his business partner Steve Cook, announced that it would close six locations belonging to two of its fast-casual chains. Pro-Palestinian activists, who have targeted the group since the beginning of the Gaza war, quickly claimed responsibility. An Instagram account devoted specifically to boycotting the company declared victory and argued that its campaign was the real reason for the decline in sales. Other users insisted that the closures reflected consumers’ refusal to support “Zionist establishments,” rather than weakening demand for fast food, and accused news organizations of concealing the boycott’s effect. The reality described by the owners, however, is considerably more complicated.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in