Prediction Markets Let You Bet on Whether a Wildfire Will Burn Down Your Town
Prediction markets like Polymarket allowed users to bet on the progression and impact of the 2025 California wildfires. Critics argue that profiting from natural disasters is morally reprehensible.
Why it matters
This raises ethical questions about the gamification of real-world tragedies and the role of prediction markets in society.
Sylvie Andrews and her partner didn’t just lose the new house they’d helped build when the Eaton Fire ripped through Altadena, California, in January 2025. They lost an entire decade’s worth of sacrifices they’d made to put down roots in their hometown, and the community they’d created. “We put a lot of blood, sweat, and tears into it,” Andrews said. “That’s what we lost in the fire.”
The article frames the practice as 'morally reprehensible' by highlighting the perspective of a fire victim, leaning into a critical ethical stance.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in