Period cycle tracking apps ‘risk causing more harm than good’, researchers warn in The BMJ

Researchers publishing in The BMJ warn that popular menstrual cycle tracking apps lack scientific evidence to support their health claims. They suggest these tools may cause harm by encouraging unhealthy fixations and distracting users from proven health behaviors.
Why it matters
As 'femtech' grows in popularity, this study highlights the potential risks of relying on unverified digital health tools for personal medical management.
Popular period tracking apps carry little benefit and, in fact, pose risks to the wellbeing of women and girls, according to new international research. In a paper published on Thursday in medical journal The BMJ, researchers called for greater scrutiny on menstrual cycle tracking apps and other “femtech” tools widely promoted on social media. They found such technology used the language of women’s empowerment to position themselves as “the next stage of the women’s health movement.” But their claims to scientifically analyse personal data to improve health, wellbeing and performance based on a user’s cycle were not backed by evidence. Anthropologist and co-author Katharine Lee from Tulane University in New Orleans said there was “very little evidence” that women could meaningfully work with the phases of their cycle to improve their health.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in