People of the Book | On the treatment of ancient, religious texts
This article explores the tension between interpreting ancient religious texts like the Manusmriti and the Quran in a modern, secular context. It contrasts the views of political figures and clerics, questioning whether these texts should be rejected entirely or reinterpreted to align with democratic values.
Why it matters
It highlights the ongoing struggle in secular democracies to balance religious tradition with constitutional rights and gender equality.
Two ongoing debates point to the double standards that Indian progressives confront. The central question relates to how an old text could be read and spoken about in the context of the present. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has made the complete rejection of Manusmriti the defining agenda of his politics, and points out that it dictates inferior roles for women; in Keralam, Islamic scholar Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliyar has said the Quran dictates an inferior role for women in society, saying, “The Holy Quran states that women should live confined within their homes and must not make public appearances.”
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in