Article may be outdated

This article is 64 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Live Law·3 min read·hard

Pedestrians Have Fundamental Right To Have Footpath; Motorists Can't Negate Right To Walk : Supreme Court

Pedestrians Have Fundamental Right To Have Footpath; Motorists Can't Negate Right To Walk : Supreme Court
AI Summary

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the right to walk on a demarcated footpath is a fundamental right under the Constitution. The court emphasized that pedestrian infrastructure must be prioritized over motorized vehicle movement.

Why it matters

This landmark ruling shifts urban planning priorities, legally empowering citizens to demand safer walking environments from municipal authorities.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

The Court held that authorities have the corresponding duty to construct and safeguard demarcated footpaths for walking. Listen to this Article In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court today held that the right to walk on a demarcated footpath is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution, which includes the right to access safe and well-demarcated footpaths. This right shall have priority over movement by motorised vehicles.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicssocial justice
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 90%

The article summarizes a legal judgment without editorializing the court's decision.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in