Article may be outdated

This article is 68 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

The Hindu·6 min read·hard

​Peace with peace: On preventive detentions

​Peace with peace: On preventive detentions
AI Summary

The Allahabad High Court has criticized the routine use of preventive detention by police and magistrates in Uttar Pradesh, noting it often violates personal liberties. The court issued new guidelines to curb the misuse of these powers in minor disputes.

Why it matters

This ruling addresses the systemic abuse of legal mechanisms that allow the state to detain citizens without formal criminal charges.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

In Chander Pal Singh , a matter involving preventive proceedings, the Allahabad High Court has simultaneously addressed a part of the criminal justice system that often receives less attention than ordinary criminal proceedings and the more overbearing reality of mechanisms designed to avert disturbances having gradually become instruments to deprive people of liberty. The state has the power to intervene before a crime occurs if it is reasonably apprehensive that a person is a threat to public order. However, it has acquired a habit of exercising that power routinely, resulting in detentions without any substantive criminal charge. The High Court’s order was based, the Bench said, on a “highly irresponsible” deprivation of personal liberties in Uttar Pradesh, where police officers and executive magistrates were using preventive powers to incarcerate individuals on the basis of arguably minor apprehensions. In Chander Pal Singh as well, the petitioner, a physically challenged Dalit advocate, had been arrested over a petty dispute with a neighbour. The Bench said that between May 2025 and April 2026, around 2,500 people were reportedly subjected to preventive detention proceedings in Ghaziabad, despite a 2021 State policy to guide the exercise of such powers.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicssocial justice
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 70%

The article reports on a judicial critique of state power, maintaining a focus on legal standards and civil rights.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in