Paul Atkins Misreads Adam Smith and the American Founding
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins is criticized for misattributing the intellectual origins of the Declaration of Independence to Adam Smith's 'Wealth of Nations' to justify a deregulatory agenda. The article argues that this historical revisionism misrepresents the founders' intent regarding public oversight.
Why it matters
The debate highlights how historical interpretation is used as a political tool to influence current regulatory policy, particularly regarding cryptocurrency and financial oversight.
On June 30, Paul Atkins, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, stood before the Economic Club of New York and delivered a history lesson. With the nation’s 250th birthday days away, Mr. Atkins told his audience that the Declaration of Independence and Adam Smith’s “Wealth of Nations,” both products of 1776, rest on “the same conviction: trust the individual, not the institution.” America’s founding documents, he said, “in many respects, reflect Smith’s central themes,” and the founders, wary of concentrated power “whether lodged in a crown, in a parliament, or in a bureaucracy,” built around liberty a governing framework “as light as prudence would permit.”
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in