Article may be outdated

This article is 36 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Times of India·2 min read·medium

Pakistan's fifth province? Gilgit-Baltistan assembly passes resolution amid PoK unrest

A
ABHISHEK MISHRA
Pakistan's fifth province? Gilgit-Baltistan assembly passes resolution amid PoK unrest
AI Summary

The Gilgit-Baltistan assembly has passed a resolution requesting that Islamabad grant the region provisional provincial status. This move aims to provide the mountainous area with formal constitutional and political rights within Pakistan.

Why it matters

Changing the administrative status of Gilgit-Baltistan could significantly alter the geopolitical landscape of the disputed Kashmir region and impact Pakistan's internal political structure.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Is Pakistan preparing to make Gilgit-Baltistan its fifth province? Amid ongoing unrest in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, the Gilgit-Baltistan assembly has passed a resolution urging Islamabad to grant the region provisional provincial status, a move that could majorly redefine its administrative structure.The Gilgit-Baltistan assembly on Thursday passed a resolution, backed by both ruling and opposition sides, urging Islamabad to grant the region provisional provincial status, according to Dawn.The resolution, moved by lawmaker Jalal Ali Shah, also sought constitutional and political rights for the people of the mountainous region.Gilgit-Baltistan, located in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, currently has a semi-provincial administrative status.Pakistan currently has four provinces -- Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. If Islamabad accepts the proposal, Gilgit-Baltistan would become the country's fifth province under a provisional arrangement.Catch the latest World News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicsworld
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 80%

The article reports on a legislative resolution using neutral language, citing both the resolution's intent and the current administrative context without taking a stance on the territorial dispute.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in