Oura faces lawsuit accusing it of misleading consumers about sleep-tracking accuracy
A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Oura, alleging that the company misled consumers regarding the accuracy of its smart ring's sleep-tracking capabilities. The plaintiffs claim the device cannot accurately measure sleep stages, which they argue requires clinical-grade equipment.
Why it matters
This case highlights growing consumer and legal scrutiny over the health claims made by wearable technology companies and the limitations of consumer-grade health tracking.
A proposed class action lawsuit is accusing smart ring maker Oura of deceiving consumers about the accuracy of its sleep tracking features.
The lawsuit, filed on Thursday by Clarkson Law Firm in San Francisco, alleges that Oura rings are unable to measure any of the physiological signals needed to assess sleep quality or determine sleep stages, and that they instead rely on AI-generated estimates that have “a coin flip’s chance of being correct,” according to the complaint .
The lawsuit follows years of Oura users taking to the internet to share their frustration with the smart ring’s sleep accuracy, with some saying they felt they slept poorly but were told their sleep had been optimal. Some have also expressed doubts about the device’s ability to monitor and detect sleep cycles.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in