Our position on open-weights models
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei clarifies the company's stance on open-weights AI models, explicitly denying that they advocate for a government ban. While acknowledging the benefits of open-weights models as a public good, he expresses concerns regarding national security and the potential for misuse by malicious actors.
Why it matters
This statement addresses growing industry tensions regarding AI regulation and the balance between open-source innovation and national security risks.
Over the last few days there has been a lot of discussion about open-weights models, especially those from China. Reports suggest that some US officials are considering banning the use of Chinese open-weights models by US companies. In response, many tech companies have signed a letter supporting open-weights models, and some people have even accused Anthropic of wanting to ban open-weights models as a means of protecting our business. Anyone who has read my past writing should know that I don’t regard such bans as a useful measure, but let me state it clearly so that there is no doubt: Anthropic has never advocated for a ban on open-weights models.
Open-weights models that don’t have dangerous capabilities are a public good: they don’t cost anything besides the compute needed to run them, and they provide value to businesses, developers, and researchers.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in