Article may be outdated

This article is 54 days old. Some details may have changed since publication.

Business Insider·4 min read·hard

OpenAI's head of Codex says AI still can't get creative design right: 'Give it up for the human brain'

OpenAI's head of Codex says AI still can't get creative design right: 'Give it up for the human brain'
AI Summary

OpenAI's Andrew Ambrosino argues that AI struggles with creative design because it lacks the subjective judgment and taste required for high-quality output. While AI is useful for speeding up workflows, experts suggest human oversight remains essential for creative tasks.

Why it matters

Addresses the ongoing debate regarding the limitations of generative AI in creative industries and the future of human-led design.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

OpenAI's head of Codex sees room for improvement in AI design. Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto via Getty Images AI famously still struggles with creative design. OpenAI's Andrew Ambrosino says design is harder to get right than code due to its subjective nature. "What's good design and what's bad design is just a little bit more tedious," he said. AI is still learning. The technology is revolutionizing all kinds of industries, but there are some things it still can't quite get right, and, by most accounts, design is one of them. The gap is not just technical. It has to do with taste, and the judgment required to know when something actually works. OpenAI's head of Codex, Andrew Ambrosino , put it simply: Design is harder to measure than code. "I think design's a little bit harder to grade than software," Ambrosino said on a recent episode of "Lenny's Podcast." "In that, creating a loop where you can train the model on what's good design and what's bad design is just a little bit more tedious and onerous than, you know, does the code compile?" Anyone working in a creative field is likely worried about the impact AI will have on their careers. So far, it seems to serve as a useful tool that speeds up some processes, but it rarely produces a polished finished product on its own. Dylan Field, the CEO of Figma , a digital design company that has taken on design behemoths like Adobe, has long argued that AI won't replace human designers. AI models are trained on the "distribution of data" and typically create designs that people recognize as "average," he said on a recent episode of "Hard Fork." The good news is that means creative jobs are safer for now. AI just means creatives have to learn new skills, like prompting or vibecoding. As the Grammy-nominated musician Bas put it at a conference at Harvard in 2024: "At the end of the day, there's going to be a certain level of human taste that's still required to prompt the AI to create something that we'll all enjoy," he said. "Let's give it up for the human brain for now," Ambrosino said. Read the original article on Business Insider

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
technologydesignbusiness
Political Bias
Center
LeftLean LCenterLean RRight
Confidence: 80%

Balanced discussion of AI capabilities and limitations citing industry experts.

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in