One year at the Bar, two years in training: What it now takes to become a judge
The Indian Supreme Court's decision to reduce the mandatory bar practice requirement for judges from three years to one has sparked a debate among legal experts. Critics argue that courtroom maturity is essential, while proponents suggest that rigorous training can compensate for the reduced practice time.
Why it matters
This change impacts the quality and preparation of the judiciary, raising questions about the balance between academic training and practical experience.
NEW DELHI: Is one year of practice at the Bar enough to prepare a lawyer for the responsibilities of a judicial officer? The Supreme Court's decision to reduce the practice requirement for entry-level judicial service from three years to one has triggered a debate over whether courtroom experience can be adequately supplemented by judicial academy training and clerkship.Former Uttarakhand high court Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi said three years of practice should remain mandatory, arguing that young lawyers need time to develop courtroom maturity and learn how to deal with lawyers and litigants.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in