NSW judge says anti-Israel graffiti case went ‘haywire’ when vandalism was labelled antisemitic
A New South Wales judge has criticized the legal handling of a vandalism case, stating that labeling anti-Israel graffiti as antisemitic led to a miscarriage of justice. The judge argued that the defendant's actions were a political protest against a foreign state rather than hate speech.
Why it matters
The case raises significant questions about the legal interpretation of political speech versus hate speech and the application of controversial definitions of antisemitism.
A vandalised car in Woollahra in November 2024. Mohommed Farhat defaced cars and walls with slogans including ‘PKK coming’ and ‘Fuk Israel’. Photograph: Neve Brissenden/AAP A vandalised car in Woollahra in November 2024. Mohommed Farhat defaced cars and walls with slogans including ‘PKK coming’ and ‘Fuk Israel’. Photograph: Neve Brissenden/AAP New South Wales NSW judge says anti-Israel graffiti case went ‘haywire’ when vandalism was labelled antisemitic Mohommed Farhat spray-painted slogans and torched a car in Woollahra. He pleaded guilty but supreme court judge says case appears to be a ‘miscarriage of justice’
Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast
Prefer the Guardian on Google For almost two years, Mohommed Farhat has been in prison after he pleaded guilty to 15 offences in connection with property damage, including spray-painting “Fuk Israel” on cars in Sydney’s east and setting another vehicle alight in late 2024.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in