Hacker News·4 min read·medium

No constitutional right to clean water, federal court finds

M
measurablefunc
No constitutional right to clean water, federal court finds
AI Summary

A federal appeals court ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not guarantee a right to clean drinking water, dismissing a lawsuit from Jackson, Mississippi residents. The court stated that lead-contaminated water does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's right to bodily integrity.

Why it matters

This ruling sets a significant legal precedent regarding the limits of constitutional protections in the context of public health and government infrastructure failures.

Dive DeeperCreate a free account to unlock

Hear this story A federal appeals court ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not guarantee the right to clean drinking water in a Sept. 4 decision rejecting Jackson, Mississippi, residents’ lawsuit over the city’s lead-contaminated water system .

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling dismissing residents’ 2022 lawsuit. The plaintiffs, Priscilla Sterling, Raine Becker, Shawn Miller and John Bennett, alleged that the city knowingly allowed residents to drink unsafe water.

They argued that the water contamination violated their constitutional right to bodily integrity under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

In the majority decision, Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote that while the deprivation of clean water was “grievous,” it did “not infringe upon any deeply rooted constitutional right.”

Continue reading on Headlinne

Create a free account to read the full article.

Read full article →
politicssocial justicehealth

Get smarter about the news

Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in