NFL joins pushback against prediction markets as U.S. Supreme Court asked to act
The NFL has filed a legal brief supporting states' rights to regulate prediction markets, citing concerns over game integrity and consumer protection. This move highlights a growing conflict between sports leagues and betting platforms like Kalshi, which are currently caught in a jurisdictional battle between federal and state regulators.
Why it matters
The outcome of this legal dispute will set a critical precedent for the regulation of prediction markets and the intersection of sports betting and financial derivatives.
The NFL said in its Thursday filing that the league had shared concerns with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which claims a role as the sole regulator of these platforms, about how they conduct sports wagers. But the NFL told the high court that its requests haven't been answered, leaving betting practices that "pose real challenges to game integrity and consumer protection." The NFL was among many filing legal briefs this week in the case supporting the states' argument that they have the right to impose local gambling laws on the emerging prediction markets.
Kalshi, for its part, is saying it has attempted to work through the issue with the NFL several times with no luck.
“We have consistently tried to engage proactively and constructively with the NFL to collaborate on market integrity with no response,” Kalshi spokesperson Elisabeth Diana said in a statement.
Also covering this story
One other newsroom covered this event. We read that version too.
Get smarter about the news
Sign up free for a feed built around what you actually care about, Dive Deeper research on any story, and the full text of every article.
Create free accountAlready have an account? Sign in